Содержание журналов

Баннер
PERSONA GRATA

Content of journals

Баннер
Баннер
Баннер
Баннер
Баннер
Баннер
Баннер
Баннер
Баннер
Баннер
Баннер
Баннер
Баннер
Баннер
Баннер


SUMMARIES OF ARTICLES № 3 (58) 2013 -1



 
EURASIAN INTEGRATION
Bogolyubov S.A.
Environmental and legal Eurasian space
After the President of the Russian State considered the foundations of environmental development, the scientific providing of forms and content of the state environmental policy in Kazakhstan, Russia, Ukraine and Belorussia, ecological and legal foundation of Eurasian space is supposed. The most important is to substantiate scientific combination of economic and environmental interests of society where the role of law is increasing.
Keywords: ecological and legal Eurasian space, environmental policy, scientific software, prospects and environmental planning in Kazakhstan, Russia, Ukraine and Belorussia.
Work bibliographic list
1. Bitabarova Zh.A. Vozmeshhenie jekologicheskogo vreda: vnutrigosudarstvennye i mezhdunarodno-pravovye aspekty. Diss. na soiskanie akademich. Stepeni «doktor filosofii» (PhD) po special'nosti mezhdunarodnoe pravo. – Almaty, 2010.
2. Bogoljubov S.A. Aktual'nye problemy jekologicheskogo prava.Uchebnik dlja magistrov. – M: Jurajt, 2011.
3. Bogoljubov S.A. Pravo i edinaja gosudarstvennaja jekologicheskaja politika // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. – 2011. – # 3. – C. 5–8.
4. Bogoljubov S.A. Otrazhenie v prave jekologicheskoj politiki //Sb. «Derzhava i pravo. U svitli suchastnoj juridichnoj dumki». – Kiev.NAN Ukrainy: Juridichna Dumka, 2010. – S. 347–357.
5. Bushev F. Pogoda portitsja v luchshuju storonu. Kak obespechit' jekologicheskuju bezopasnost' Sojuznogo gosudarstva // Sojuz. Belarus'-Rossija. – 2012. – # 11. – S. 1–2.
6. Erkinbaeva L.K. Zakon Respubliki Kazahstan «O nedrah i nedropol'zovanii» i problemy sovershenstvovanija jekologicheskogo zakonodatel'stva // Materialy Devjatoj Mezhdunarodnoj Atyrauzskoj pravovoj konferencii. – Atyrau, 2011. – S. 13–18.
7. Zalihanov M.Ch, Stepanov S.A. Tehnologicheskie i politicheskie aspekty sovremennoj jekologicheskoj politiki Rossii //Bjulleten' «Ispol'zovanie i ohrana prirodnyh resursov v Rossii». –2010. –# 5.
8. Kolbasov O.S. Zaveshhanie jekologam // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. –2000. –# 5/6. –C. 89.
9. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe i nacional'noe regulirovanie jekologicheskoj sfery obshhestva. Sb. statej (sost. Ju.S. Shemshuchenko, S.A. Bogoljubov). –M.: IZiSP, 2011; Shemshuchenko Ju.S., Palehov D.A. Strategicheskaja jekologicheskaja ocenka v svete evropejskogo opyta; Shuplecova Ju.I. Ustojchivoe upravlenie lesami (Monreal'skij process); Get'man A.P., Lozo V.I. Gosudarstvenno-pravovye problemy preodolenija jekologicheskogo krizisa v jepohu globalizacii; Bogoljubov S.A. Sochetanie pravovyh mezhdunarodnyh i nacional'nyh terminov i principov v jekologicheskoj sfere; Chernous A.V. Jekologo-pravovye aspekty otvetstvennosti proizvoditelej; Tiunov O.I. Predmet, sistema i principy mezhdunarodnogo prava okruzhajushhej sredy; Tolkachenko E.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie ohrany zelenyh nasazhdenij naselennyh punktov v Ukraine; Vasil'eva M.I. Realizacija prav grazhdan v sfere ohrany okruzhajushhej sredy: metodologija analiza; Fedorovskaja O.B. Princip demokratii v jekologicheskom prave Ukrainy i ego rol' v osushhestvlenii obshhestvennogo kontrolja v sfere ohrany prirodno-zapovednogo fonda i poverhnostnyh vod; Bevelikova N.M. Reshenie jekologicheskih problem v KNR: pravovye aspekty; Ponomarev M.V. Garmonizacija zakonodatel'stva Rossii i Ukrainy v oblasti obrashhenija s othodami na osnove principov evropejskogo prava.
10. Nedropol'zovanie i pravo. –2011. –# 2: Eljubaev Zh.S. Problemy pravovogo obespechenija gosudarstvennoj jekologicheskoj politiki v Kazahstane; Erkinbaeva L.K. Problemy pravovoj ohrany okruzhajushhej sredy ot zagrjaznenija upakovochnymi othodami v Respublike Kazahstan; Merkusheva Zh.P. Nadezhnaja zashhita.
11. Pahareva G.V. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy garmonizacii jekologicheskogo zakonodatel'stva Rossijskoj Federacii i Respubliki Belarus'. Diss. na soiskanie uch. stepeni kand. jur. nauk. –M.: IZiSP, 2009. –187 c.
   


 
INTERNATIONAL LAW
Khlestov O.N.
Russian doctrine of international law
In this article, events, affecting international law and its trends, are discussed. UN resolutions on
the rule of law at the national and international levels are considered in the view of the life of the world community and domestic affairs of states. The role of the international law doctrine in the domestic and foreign policy of the states including Russia is shown. Considerations on the content of the Russian international law doctrine are set forth.
Keywords: foreign intervention, humanitarian intervention, peaceful means of dispute settlement, human rights protection.
Work bibliographic list
1. Ashavskij B.M. O roli doktriny v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave // Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2012. – # 1.
2. Materialy kruglogo stola «Politicheskie i mezhdunarodno-pravovye aspekty problemy gumanitarnoj intervencii», sostojavshegosja 8 dekabrja 2004 g. // Bjulleten' # 3 Obshhestvennogo dvizhenija «Za ukreplenie demokraticheskogo mirovogo pravoporjadka i v podderzhku OON». – M., 2005.
   


 
INTERNATIONAL LAW
Rodionov K.S.
From the history of extradition in Russia
The author investigates the circumstances of the misunderstanding of one of the articles of the 911 Treaty of Kiev Prince Oleg with Byzantium, as a norm, which supposedly deals with mutual
extradition of nationals in the event of their escape in another state after committing a crime. As a result of the analysis of the article and related to it documents the author came to a conclusion that it deals not with extradition , but with widely spread common practice since ancient times of independent search and forced delivery (drive) to the court by the creditor of his fraudulent debtor escaping from payment of debt abroad. All that the lender has to make on his own personal by personal forces and means, without any assistance from the authorities of both countries.
Keywords: extradition, Kievan Rus, the 911 Treaty of Kiev Prince Oleg with Byzantium, Roman law.
Work bibliographic list
1. Beljaev I.D. Istorija russkogo zakonodatel'stva. – SPb: «Lan'», 1999.
2. Volzhenkina V.M. Normy mezhdunarodnogo prava v rossijskom ugolovnom processe. – SPb. : «Juridicheskij centr Press», 2001.
3. Grekov B.D. Kievskaja Rus'. Pamjatniki istorii Kievskogo gosudarstva IH–HII vekov. – M., 1953.
4. Grocij G. O prave vojny i mira. – M.: «Nauka», 1956.
5. Gumilev L.N. Ot Rusi do Rossii. Ocherki jetnicheskoj imperii. – M., 2002.
6. Dogovor russkih s grekami i predshestvovavshie zakljucheniju ih pohody russkih na Vizantiju. (K tysjacheletiju dogovora Olega 911 goda) / Pod red. N. Marksa. – M.: Izd. Moskovskogo arheologicheskogo instituta, 1912.
7. Demosfen. Rechi (Perevod s grecheskogo). – M.: Izd. Akademii nauk, 1954.
8. Digesty Justiniana / Otv. Red. L.L. Kofanov. – T. I. – M.: «Statut», 2001.
9. Ivanov N.P. Harakteristika mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij i mezhdunarodnogo prava v istoricheskom razvitii. – Kazan', 1874.
10. Ilovajskij D.I. Kratkij kurs russkoj istorii. – M.: CSI Moskovskogo fonda kul'tury. – Ch.1. – 1962.
11. Karamzin N.M. Istorija gosudarstva rossijskogo. – T. I. – M.: «Nauka», 1989.
12. Kljuchevskij V.O. Soch. v vos'mi tomah. – T. I. – M., 1956.
13. Kljuchevskij V.O. Kratkoe posobie po russkoj istorii. – M.:«Progress», 1992.
14. Kozhevnikov F.I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Uchebnik. – M., 1967.
15. Koptev A.V. Kodifikacija Feodosija i ee predposylki. Drevnee pravo. – M.: «Spark». – 1996. – # 1.
16. Kotljar I.F. Drevnjaja Rus' v legendarnyh predanijah i legendah. – Kiev: «Naukova Dumka», 1986.
17. Lev Diakon. Istorija. – M.: «Nauka», 1988.
18. Lipshic E.Je. Zakonodatel'stvo i jurisprudencija Vizantii v IH–HI vekah. Istoriko-juridicheskie jetjudy. – L.: «Nauka», 1981.
19. Lipshic E.Je. Juridicheskie shkoly i razvitie pravovoj nauki. Kul'tura Vizantii. – T. I. – M., 1984.
20. Lukin D. Kopejke – 450 let. – M.: «Sobesednik», 1985. – # 10.
21. Milov L.V. Legenda ili real'nost'? (O neizvestnoj reforme Vladimira i Pravde Jaroslava) Drevnee pravo. – M.: «Spark», 1996. –# 1.
22. Obnorskij S.P. Jazyk dogovorov russkih s grekami. Jazyk i myshlenie. VI–VII. – M.–L.: Izd. Akademii nauk SSSR, 1936.
23. Oppengejm L. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. – T. II. – Polutom I. – M.:In. lit., 1949.
24. Pamjatniki russkogo prava. Vypusk pervyj. Pamjatniki prava Kievskogo gosudarstva H-HP vv./ Sost. A.A. Zimin. – M.: Gos. jur. izdat, 1952.
25. Povest' vremennyh let. V 2-h chastjah. – M–L.: Izd. AkademiiNauk SSSR, 1950.
26. Rennenkampf N. Ocherki juridicheskoj jenciklopedii. – Kiev,1868.
27. Rossijskoe zakonodatel'stvo v devjati tomah. – Tom 1: Zakonodatel'stvo Drevnej Rusi. – S. 21–22.
28. Saharov A. Diplomatija Svjatoslava. – 2-e izd., dop. – M., 1991.
29. Simson Je. O nevydache sobstvennyh poddannyh. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe issledovanie. – Sankt-Peterburg, 1892.
30. Sobolevskij A. Kirillo-Mefodievskie voprosy // Universitetskie zapiski. – 1885. – # 9.
31. Sjuzjumov M.Ja. St. Lev diakon i ego vremja. Vizantijskoe obshhestvo / Lev Diakon, Istorija. – M., 1988. – S. 137–165.
32. Uspenskij F.I. Istorija Vizantijskoj imperii. Period Makedonskoj dinastii (867 – 1057). – M.: «Mysl'», 1997. – S. 270.
33. Jushkov S.V. Obshhestvenno-politicheskij stroj i pravo Kievskogo gosudarstva. – M., 1949.
34. Jengel's F. Proishozhdenie sem'i, chastnoj sobstvennosti i gosudarstva. – M.: «Politika», 1965.
   
 
INTERNATIONAL LAW
Smbatyan A.S.
Precedential decisions of international judicial bodies
Based on the analysis of citations from the decisions of such international judicial bodies (IJB) as the International Court of Justice, WTO DS B, EC tHR, international criminal tribunals and international investment arbitration the author comes to a conclusion that the citation and adoption of the earlier conclusions is one of the characteristic features of the contemporary IJB. The author notes that one of the reasons behind the earlier conclusions citation is the added legitimacy of such decisions. Citation of the IJB decisions results in the formation of a specific group of judicial decisions based on precedent. Despite the non-application of the stare decisis doctrine in the international law system, the author traced a tendency towards the predominantly motivated deviation from the approaches and conclusions formulated by the earlier precedents with regard to the same international law issues.
Keywords: decision, international court, arbitration, law, precedential, citation, borrowing, DS B, criminal tribunal.
Work bibliographic list
1. Ahmet Ozkan and Others v. Turkey (2004).
2. Aksoy v. Turkey (1996).
3. Application No 002/2012 - Delta International Investments S.A., Mr and Mrs A.G.L. De Lange v. The Republic of South Africa.
4. Application 010/2011 - Efoua Mbozo'o Samuel v. Pan African Parliament.
5. Application No 001/2008-Michelot Yogogombaye versus the Republic of Senegal.
6. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro). ICJ Reports, 2007.
7. Arbitration between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the French Republic on the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf [Western Approaches] (Great Britain/France) (Ad hoc tribunal, 1977–1978).
8. Australian Subsidy on Ammonium Sulphate (GATT/CP.4/39, adopted on 3 April 1950, BISD II/188).
9. Balyemez v. Turkey (2005).
10. Case No. SCSL-04-16-T against Brima, Kamara, Kanu, Judgment of 20 June 2007.
11. Chahal v. United Kingdom (1996).
12. China – Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products, WT/DS363/AB/R, adopted 19 January 2010.
13. China – Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products, WT/DS363/R and Corr.1, adopted 19 January 2010, as modified by Appellate Body Report WT/DS363/AB/R.
14. CMS Gas Transmission Co. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID CASE NO. ARB/01/8, May 12, 2005.
15. Continental Shelf (Tunisia/Libya). ICJ Reports, 1982.
16. Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Guinea and Guinea-Bissau (Guinea/Guinea-Bissau) (Ad hoc tribunal, 1985).
17. Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area (Canada/USA). ICJ Reports, 1984.
18. Continental Shelf (Libya/Malta). ICJ Reports, 1985.
19. Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh v. Myanmar). ITLOS, 2012.
20. El Paso Energy International Company v. the Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/15, Decision on Jurisdiction, 27 April 2006.
21. Emilio Agustin Maffezini v. the Kingdom of Spain, Objections to Jurisdiction. Case No. ARB/97/7 (2000).
22. European Communities and Certain Member States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft, WT/DS316/R, adopted 1 June 2011, as modified by Appellate Body Report, WT/DS316/AB/R.
23. Ireland v. the United Kingdom (1978).
24. Joy Mining Machinery Limited v. the Arabic Republic of Egypt, Award on Jurisdiction, ICSID case No. ARB/03/11, August 6, 2004.
25. Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine). ICJ Reports, 2009.
26. MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd and MTD Chile SA v. Republic of Chile (ICSID Case no. ARB/01/7), Award of 25 May 2004.
27. Noble Ventures, Inc. v. Romania, Award October 12, 2005 ICSID Case No ARB/01/11.
28. North Sea Continental Shelf (Germany/Denmark; Germany/Netherlands). ICJ Reports, 1969.
29. Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24), Decision on Jurisdiction (8 February 2005).
30. The Prosecutor v. Alfred Musema (Judgement and Sentence), ICTR- 96-13-T, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), 27 January 2000.
31. The Prosecutor v. Anto Furundzija (Trial Judgment), IT-95- 17/1-T, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 10 December 1998.
32. Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir Kovac and Zoran Vukovic (Trial Judgment), IT-96-23-T & IT-96-23/1-T, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 22 February 2001.
33. The Prosecutor v. Eliézer Niyitegeka (Judgment and Sentence), ICTR- 96-14-T, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), 16 May 2003.
34. The Prosecutor v. Jean de Dieu Kamuhanda, Case No. ICTR-95- 54A-T, ICTR, Judgment of 22 January 2004.
35. The Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu (Trial Judgment), ICTR-96- 4-T, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), 2 September 1998.
36. The Prosecutor v. Juvénal Kajelijeli, Case No. ICTR-98-44A-T, ICTR, Judgment of 1 December 2003Prosecutor v. Kajelijeli.
37. The Prosecutor v. Laurent Semanza, Case No. ICTR-97-20-T, ICTR, Judgment of 15 May 2003.
38. The Prosecutor v. Mikaeli Muhimana (Judgement and Sentence), ICTR- 95-1B-T, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR),
28 April 2005.
39. The Prosecutor v. Milomir Stakic, Case No. IT-97-24-T, Judgment of 31 July 2003.
40. The Prosecutor v. Ramush Haradinaj, Idriz Balaj and Lahi
Brahimaj, Case No. IT-04-84-T, ICTY, Judgment of 3 April 2008.
   
 
INTERNATIONAL LAW
Irzhanov A.S.
On the notion of terrorism in international law
The article deals with the notion of terrorism in international law.
Keywords: international terrorism, terrorism, legislation in countering terrorism.
Work bibliographic list
1. Sidorov V.A. K voprosu o sushhnosti mezhdunarodnogo terrorizma i formah bor'by s nim // Politicheskie tehnologii PR protiv mezhdunarodnogo terrorizma: Materialy «kruglogo stola», Moskva, In-t Evropy RAN, 28 nojabrja 2001 g. – M., 2002.
2. Kuznecov A.P. Izosimov S.V. Garmonizacija rossijskoj i zarubezhnoj ugolovno-pravovyh sistem po protivodejstviju mezhdunarodnomu terrorizmu: teoretiko-prikladnoj aspekt// Rossijskaja i evropejskaja pravozashhitnye sistemy: sootnoshenie i problemy garmonizacii: Sbornik statej/ Pod red. V.M. Baranova. — Nizhnij Novgorod, 2003.
3. Lazutin L.A. K voprosu o ponjatii i formah projavlenija mezhdunarodnogo terrorizma // Rossijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – Ekaterinburg, 2000. – #2.
4. Gorbunov Ju.S. Osnovnye jetapy dogovorno-pravovogo regulirovanija mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva gosudarstv v protivodejstvii terrorizmu // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedenija. – 2006. – # 3.
5. Zakon Respubliki Kazahstan «O ratifikacii Shanhajskoj konvencii o bor'be s terrorizmom, separatizmom i jekstremizmom»ot 18 aprelja 2002 goda # 316 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa:URL: http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z020000316.
6. Zakon Respubliki Kazahstan «O ratifikacii Dogovora o sotrudnichestve gosudarstv-uchastnikov Sodruzhestva Nezavisimyh Gosudarstv v bor'be s terrorizmom» ot 23 oktjabrja 2000 g. N 93 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z000000093.
7. Zakon Respubliki Kazahstan «O vnesenii izmenenij i dopolnenij v nekotorye zakonodatel'nye akty Respubliki Kazahstan po voprosam protivodejstvija terrorizmu ot 8 janvarja 2013 goda # 63-V.
[Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z1300000063.
8. Zakon Respubliki Kazahstan «O protivodejstvii terrorizmu» ot 13 ijulja 1999 g. // Baza dannyh «Zakon» ver. 6.0 – RCPI Ministerstva Justicii RK.
9. Chuganov E.G. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye standarty i normy v oblasti protivodejstvija terrorizmu // Rossijskij sledovatel'. –2004. – # 12.
10. Volova L.I., Belokon' A. V. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye sredstva bor'by s mezhdunarodnym terrorizmom/ Materialy mezhdunarodnoj konferencii, organizovannoj Diplomaticheskoj akademii MID Rossii: «Aktual'nye voprosy protivodejstvija mezhdunarodnoj prestupnosti na sovremennom jetape»( 19 aprelja 2005 g.). – M., 2005.
11. Poljanichko E.G. Formirovanie mezhdunarodnyh rezhimov bor'by s terrorizmom. – M., 2008.
12. Slovar' mezhdunarodnogo prava / Otv. red. B.M. Klimenko. –M.,1986.
13. Emel'janov V.P. Terrorizm i prestuplenija s priznakami terrorizirovanija: ugolovno-pravovoe issledovanie. – SPb., 2002.
14. Damaskin O.V. Terrorizm v uslovijah novyh tehnologij //Problemy bor'by s terrorizmom. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii 21 marta 2000 g. – M., 2000.
15. Latypov U.R. K voprosu ob opredelenii mezhdunarodnogo terrorizma // Sovetskij ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava 1988. – M., 1989.
16. Habachirov L. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye problemy identifikacii i protivodejstvija ugroze jadernogo terrorizma – Nal'chik, 2005.
17. Trunov I.L. Sovershenstvovanie pravovyh osnov kontrterroristicheskoj vojny// Juridicheskij mir. – 2004. – # 12.
18. Kirichenko A.A. K voprosu o ponjatii terrorizma // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta . – 2010. – # 332.
19. Gladkih V.I. Mezhdunarodnyj terrorizm: problemy pravovogo regulirovanija // Rossijskij sledovatel'. – 1999. – # 1.
20. Avdeev Ju.I., Gus'kov A.Ja. Praktika terrorizma v nachale XXI veka i problemy sovershenstvovanija antiterroristicheskogo zakonodatel'stva / Sbornik dokumentov i materialov «Zakonodatel'noe obespechenie bor'by s terrorizmom». – M., 2003.
21. Dolgova A.I. Konkretizacija ponjatija terrorizma v kriminologicheskih i pravovyh celjah // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2003. – # 2.
22. Jepshtejn V.A. Terrorizm: problema opredelenija ponjatija //Vestnik TISBI. – 2001. – # 2 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa:URL: http://old.tisbi.org/science/vestnik/2001/issue2/vest2_6[1].html.
23. Gerasimov V.N. Sizov A.A. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe sotrudnichestvo v bor'be s terrorizmom. – Kursk, 2008.
24. Lepeshkin N.Ja. Psihologicheskie osnovy terrorizma i antiterroristicheskoj dejatel'nosti v sovremennyh uslovijah: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie / N.Ja. Lepeshkin, V.G. Vasilin, A.I. Obirin, V.E. Talynev; pod red. prof. I.F. Jarulina. – Habarovsk, 2008.
   
 
DIPLOMATIC LAW
Belkovets L.P.
«Our response to Chamberlain». Once again about Soviet-English diplomatic conflict of the 1920-s
The article investigates the history of the Soviet-English diplomatic conflict of the 1920-s during which widely known saying «Our response to Chamberlain» was born. It is actively used now not only to characterize an independent and sure position of the Russian government in its relations with the western partners but also to distort the real sense of the position of the Russian present and soviet government of that time. The article is based on diplomatic acts and researches of the best Russian experts in the field of a diplomatic law and practice.
Key words: England, USS R, diplomacy, conflict, rupture, policy, propaganda, espionage, support, public.
   
  
EUROPEAN LAW
Belova G.
The European Court of Human Rights practice connected with the initial right to life
The article analyzes the right to life on the basis of international conventions on human rights and the European Court of Human Rights decisions, as well as from when the right to life begins.
Keywords: European Court, bioethics, EC tHR decision, the right to life, the interpretation of the law, each person, the embryo.
   

Kopylov M.N.

Solntsev A.M.
 
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
Kopylov M.N., Solntsev A.M.
International Environmental Law in Front of Contemporary Challenges (International environmental court)
The current state of international legal regulation of international environmental relations, when
rapidly augmenting normative array does not lead to real improvement of ecological situation in the world urgently calls for the need of serious reform of international environmental law, especially with regard to enhancing the effectiveness of existing mechanisms of environmental cooperation among states and the establishment of new mechanisms for such cooperation. Following the articles published in № 12 of Eurasian Law Journal for 2012 and in № 1 of Eurasian Law Journal for 2013, which analyzed the acceptance of Environmental Constitution of the Earth and the establishment of the World environmental organization, the authors of this article justify the need of foundation of the International environmental court to solve urgent ecological issues.
Key words: international environmental law, environmental security, World environmental organization, World Environmental Constitution, International environmental court.
Work bibliographic list
1. Abashidze A.H., Solncev A.M. Jekocid kak mezhdunarodnoe prestuplenie: problemy i perspektivy // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravosudie: Sovremennye problemy / Pod red. G.I. Bogusha, E.N. Trikoz. – M., 2009.
2. Vinogradov S.V. Sudebnoe rassmotrenie sporov, svjazannyh s transnacional'nym ushherbom okruzhajushhej srede // Voprosy mezhdunarodnogo morskogo i vozdushnogo prava. – M., 1979.
3. Kolodkin R.A. Fragmentacija mezhdunarodnogo prava // Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava.- 2005. – # 2 (58).
4. Kopylov M.N. Vvedenie v mezhdunarodnoe jekologicheskoe pravo. – M., 2007.
5. Kopylov M.N. Mezhdunarodnaja jekologicheskaja administracija // Zakon i pravo. – 1998. – # 10.
6. Kopylov M.N. Mezhdunarodnoe jekologicheskoe pravo // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo / Pod red. A.Ja. Kapustina. – M., 2008.
7. Kopylov M.N. Mezhdunarodnoe jekologicheskoe pravo kak otrasl' sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo. –2007. – # 1.
8. Solncev A.M. K 15-letiju dejatel'nosti Mezhdunarodnogo tribunala po morskomu pravu // Rossijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. –2012. – # 4 (85).
9. Solncev A.M. Mirnoe razreshenie mezhdunarodnyh jekologicheskih sporov: teorija i praktika (na primere spora Irlandii s Velikobritaniej o zavode po proizvodstvu MOKS) // Aktual'nye problemy sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava: materialy mezhvuzovskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Moskva, 17.04.2006 / Pod red. A.Ja. Kapustina, A.H. Abashidze. – M., 2006.
10. Solncev A.M. Praktikum po mezhdunarodnomu jekologicheskomu pravu. – M., 2011.
11. Solncev A.M. Rol' mezhdunarodnyh sudebnyh uchrezhdenij v razreshenii mezhdunarodnyh jekologicheskih sporov: Avtoref. dis. ...kand. jurid. nauk. – M., 2008.
12. Shemshuchenko Ju.S. Pljus jekologizacija vsej Zemli (problemy kodifikacii mezhdunarodnogo jekologicheskogo prava) // Jekologicheskoe pravo. – 2009. – # 2/3.
13. Shemshuchenko Ju.S. Jekologicheskaja konstitucija Zemli: konceptual'nye podhody // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2008. – # 6.
14. Hey E. Reflections on an International Environmental Court. –The Hague, 2000.
15. Jennings R. Need for an Environmental Court? // Environmental Policy and Law. – 1992. – # 20.
16. Jennings R. The Role of the International Court of Justice in the Development of International Environmental Protection Law // Review of European Community International Environmental Law. – 1992. – Vol. 1.
17. Mackenzie R., Sands Ph. Settlement of Disputes under International Environmental Agreements: A Potential Role for the PCA. Background Paper for the Bureau of the PCA. 1997. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http: www.pca-cpa.org.
18. McCallion K. F., Sharma H. R. Environmental Justice Without Borders: The Need for an International Court of the Environment to Protect Fundamental Environmental Rights // George Washington Journal of International Law and Economy. – 2000. – # 32.
19. Murphy S. D. Does the World Need a New International Environmental Court? // George Washington Journal of International Law and Economy. – 2000. – # 32.
20. Postiglione A. The Global Environmental Crisis: The Need for an International Court of the Environment. – Florence, Giunti, 1996.
21. Rest A. Need for an International Court for the Environment? Undeveloped Legal Protection of the Individual in Transnational Litigation // Environmental Policy and Law. – 1994. – Vol. 24.
22. Sands Ph. Environmental Disputes and the Permanent Court of Arbitration: Issues for Consideration, Background Paper for Secretary-General of the PCA, 1996.
23. Stoll P. Controlling Genetically Modified Organisms: the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and the SPS Agreement // Yearbook of International Environmental Law. – 1999. – # 10.
24. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http: www.itlos.org.
   


 
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
Tsipris M.S.
Trilateral cooperation to conserve seals in the wadden sea
The article examines the 1990 Agreement on the conservation of seals in the Wadden sea signed by Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands. The Agreement is adopted under the auspices of the 1979 Bonn Convention on the conservation of migratory species of wild animals. The history of
the adoption of the Agreement and the cooperation of the said states in the Wadden sea region are considered. Conservation and Management Plan for the Wadden Sea Seal Population 2012-2016 is examined.
Keywords: Wadden Sea, Bonn Convention, migratory species, wild animals, conservation, harbour seal, grey seal.
Work bibliographic list
1. Konvencija po sohraneniju migrirujushhih vidov dikih zhivotnyh [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http:// www.cms.int/documents/convtxt/cms_convtxt_russian.pdf.
2. Kopylov M.N. Vvedenie v mezhdunarodnoe jekologicheskoe pravo. – M., 2007.
3. Kopylov S.M. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo o sohranenii tjulenej //Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2010. – #7 (26).
4. Naumann S. Sblizhenie s prirodoohrannoj politikoj Evropejskogo Sojuza (ES): Kratkij putevoditel' dlja stran-partnerov po Evropejskoj politike dobrososedstva i Rossii. – Evropejskoe Soobshhestvo, 2008. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enlarg/pdf/pubs/nature_ru.pdf.
5. Cipris M.S. Evropejskij Sojuz i ohrana migrirujushhih vidov dikih zhivotnyh // Aktual'nye problemy sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava: Materialy ezhegodnoj mezhvuzovskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Moskva, 8-9 aprelja 2011 g.: V 2 ch. / Otv. red. A.H. Abashidze, E.V. Kiseleva. – M., 2012. – Ch. II.6. 20 years of seal protection in the Wadden Sea [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/de/news/2010-10-19-20-years-seal-protection-wadden-sea.
7. Agreement on the Conservation of Seals in the Wadden Sea [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.waddenseasecretariat.org/management/SMP/Seals-Agreement.pdf.
8. CMS Family Guide. Agreements and MoUs [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: www.cms.int.
9. Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Flora and Fauna 1992 // Official Journal. – 1992. – 22 June. – L 206. –P. 0007–0050. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31992L0043:EN:HTML.
10. Harding K.C., Härkönen T., Pineda J. Estimating quasi-extinction risk of European harbor seals: a reply to Lonergan and Harwood // Ecology Letters. – 2003. – # 6.
11. Härkönen T. Development of Populations of Harbour Seals and Grey Seals in the Wadden Sea and the North Sea since 1988 // Wadden Sea Ecosystem. – 2003. – # 17.
12. Hunter J. Environmental Regimes in the European Union: A Comparison of Effectiveness by Regime Level. – Ann Arbor, 2008.
13. Kreutzer M., Kreutzer R., Siebert U., Müller G., Reijnders P., Brasseur S., Härkönen T., Dietz R., Sonne C., Born E.W., Baumgärtner W. In search of virus carriers of the 1988 and 2002 phocine distemper virus outbreaks in European harbor seals // Archives of Virology. – 2008. – Vol. 153.
14. Reijnders P.J.H., Abt K.F., Brasseur S.M.J.M. Marine Mammals //Wadden Sea Ecosystem. – 2005. – # 19. – P. 305.
15. Seal count 2012: more seals than ever before in the Wadden Sea [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.waddenseaworldheritage. org/news/2012-10-31-seal-count-2012-more-seals-everwadden- sea.
16. Soulé M.E. Viable populations for conservation. – Cambridge, 1987 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://books.google.ru/bo oks?id=pjo5FP5gpFIC&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false.
   
  
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
Kopylov S.M., Shaidullina A.A.
Regional international legal regimes of conservation of biodiversity
In the article regional international legal regimes of conservation of biodiversity are shown on The 1979 conservation of European wildlife and natural habitats Convention, The 1980 Convention on the conservation of Antarctic marine living resources, The 1985 ASE AN Agreement on the conservation of nature and natural resources, The 1990 Agreement on the conservation of Wadden Sea seals. It is concluded that regional cooperation on conservation of nature has certain advantages.
Keywords: regional regime, biodiversity, conservation, ecosystem approach, mutual control, conservation status.
Work bibliographic list
1. Abashidze A.H., Solncev A.M. Usilenie jekologicheskoj otvetstvennosti v sisteme Dogovora ob Antarktike (na puti k Mezhdunarodnomu poljarnomu godu (2007–2008 gg.)) // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2006. –# 10. – S. 59–66.
2. Vylegzhanin A.N., Gureev S.A., Ivanov G.G. Mezhdunarodnoe morskoe pravo / pod red. S.A. Gureeva. – M.: Jurid. lit., 2003.
3. Golicyn V.V. Antarktika: tendencii razvitija rezhima. – M.:Mezhdunar. otnoshenija, 1989.
4. Kolbasov O.S. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaja ohrana okruzhajushhej sredy. – M.: Mezhdunar. otnoshenija, 1982.
5. Kopylov M.N. Mezhdunarodnye organizacii i ohrana okruzhajushhej sredy // Mezhdunarodnye organizacii: Uchebnik / pod red. I.P. Blishhenko. – M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 1994. – S. 267–304.
6. Kopylov S.M. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo o sohranenii tjulenej //Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal, 2010. – # 7 (26). – S. 120–124.
7. Kopylov S.M. Prava zhivotnyh v Antarktike (k 30-letiju Konvencii o sohranenii morskih zhivyh resursov Antarktiki 1980g.) //Mezhdunarodnoe pravo – International Law. – 2010. – # 2 (42). – S. 63–67.
8. Kopylov S.M. Perspektivy jekologo-pravovogo statusa Antarktiki v svete promyshlennoj razrabotki ee resursov // Aktual'nye problemy sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava: Materialy ezhegodnoj mezhvuzovskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Moskva, 8–9 aprelja 2011 g. V 2-h chastjah / otv. red. A.H. Abashidze, E.V. Kiseleva. – M., 2012. – Ch. II. – S. 299–308.
9. Kopylov S.M. Sistema Dogovora ili sistema dogovorov ob Antarktike? // Aktual'nye problemy sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava: Materialy ezhegodnoj mezhvuzovskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Moskva, 9–10 aprelja 2010 g. / pod red. A.H. Abashidze,
M.N. Kopylova, E.V. Kiselevoj. – M.: RUDN, 2011. – Ch. II. – S. 219–227.
11. Kopylov S.M., Mohammad S.A. Mezhdunarodnoe upravlenie Antarktikoj: jeffektivnost' i legitimnost' Sistemy Dogovora ob Antarktike // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo – International Law. – 2009. –# 4 (40). – S. 204–227.
12. Nguen K.T. Konvencija ASEAN 1985 g. kak hronologicheski vtoroj primer jekosistemnogo upravlenija // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo –International Law. – 2011. – # 1–2 (45–46). – S. 108–112.
13. Nguen K.T. Jugo-Vostochnaja Azija kak edinaja jekosistema i «metod ASEAN» // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo –International Law. –2011. – # 1– (45–6). –S. 264–68.
14. Mohammad S.A. Mezhdunarodnoe jekologicheskoe pravo v istoricheskoj retrospektive // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2011. –# 8 (39). –S. 44–9.
15. Sokolova N.A. Antropocentricheskij podhod v mezhdunarodnom prave okruzhajushhej sredy // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo –International Law. –2009. –# 2 (38). –S. 5–7.
16. Jarullina M.Sh. Mezhdunarodnye akty po ohrane zhivotnogo mira // Sbornik aspirantskih nauchnyh rabot. –Kazan': Izd-vo Kazan.un-ta, 2008. –Vyp. 9. –S. 326–27.
17. Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Flora and Fauna 1992 // Official Journal, 1992, 22 June. – L 206. –P. 0007-0050 (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31992L0043:EN:HTML).
18. Freestone D. The Conservation of Marine Ecosystems under International Law // International Law and the Conservation of Biological Diversity / Ed. by M. Bowman, C. Redgwell. –London –The Hague – Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1996. –P. 91–07.
19. International Regimes / S.D. Krasner (ed.). –N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983.
20. The Global Environment: Institutions, Law, and Policy. – 3rd Edition / R.S. Axelrod, S.D. VanDeveer, D.L. Downie (eds). – Washington: CQPress, 2011.
   

Anisimov А.P.

Wystorobets E.A.
 
INTERECOLAW
Anisimov А.P., Wystorobets E.A.
Liability in interecolaw: a response to the monograph by d.s. boklan of 2012
The present article is devoted to the work which opens in scale of the monographs new scientific
field of research of liability in Interecolaw. The results depicted in the book and prospective fields of research are considered. An attempt to ground shortly the concept of the measures of impulses in interecolaw is made. The source studies analysis of the topic is carried out. The proposals on conceptional unity of the branch of law research and to technical and correction work of book publishers are concluded with deeply positive conclusion about the author’s work and its input into the development of Interecolaw and International Economic Law.
Keywords: responsibility, «pure» liability, transboundary harm, transboundary loss, environment, ecologichnost’* (environmentality), sanctions, enforcement, measures of impulses, Interecolaw, International Economic Law.


   

 
INTERECOLAW
Kamilova I.V.
Universal international legal mechanisms to combat environmental crimes
This article analyzes the basic institutional and legal measures and mechanisms to combat environmental crimes, the role of international cooperation and international organizations, international agreements and international conventions to prevent environmental problems and prophylaxis.
Keywords: environmental crime, environmental problems, natural environment, the atmosphere, the biosphere, international organizations, international treaties, international conventions.
Work bibliographic list
1. Avakov O. Pravovoe obespechenie jekologicheskih prav grazhdan // Zakonnost'. – 2001. – #2. – S. 20.
2. Erofeev B. V. Jekologicheskoe pravo: Uchebnik. – M.: Jurisprudencija, 1999. – 445 s.
3. Zhevlakov Je.N. Jekologicheskie prestuplenija: ponjatie, vidy, problemy otvetstvennosti. Dis. doktora jurid. nauk. – M., 1991. – 478 s.
4. Kopylov M.N. Jekologicheskaja bezopasnost': ponjatijno-terminologicheskij aspekt // Zakon i pravo. – 2000. – # 3. – S. 52–56.
5. Kurchenko V.D. Problemy primenenija norm o prestuplenijah protiv jekologicheskoj bezopasnosti naselenija. Dis. kand. jurid.nauk. – Volgograd, 2000. – 227 s.
6. Lukashuk I.I., Naumov A.V. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo:Uchebnik. – M.: Spark, 1999. – S. 161.
7. Petrov V.V. Jekologicheskie prestuplenija: ponjatie i sostavy // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1993. – #8. – S. 88–93.
   

 
INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW
Klemin A.V.
Private law as a soft weapon of the XX I century
In the light of drafting renewed civil code in the Russian Federation the present article considers
not a simple role of private law in contemporary states as well as in international relations.
Keywords: Civil code of RF, private law, civil law, market status, international law, public law.


   
  
LAW OF CIS COUNTRIES
Krasitskaya L.V.
On the judicial protection of the child’s rights in modern Ukraine
Main directions of the judicial protection of the family child’s rights in modern Ukraine are discovered in the article. It is proved the necessity to expand legal ways of the protection of the child’s rights, reasonability to apply decisions of the European Court of Human Rights about the protection of the child’s rights in order to guarantee international standards of child’s rights.
Keywords: child’s rights; judicial protection of rights; ways of the protection; international standards of child’s rights.
Work bibliographic list
1. Bespalov Ju.F. Sudebnaja zashhita prav rebenka. Dis. …kand. jurid. nauk: 12.00.03. – M.: RPA, 1997. – 172 s.
2. Naselennja Ukraїni (http://database.ukrcensus.gov.ua/PXWEB2007/).
3. Pchelinceva L.M. Semejnoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik /L.M. Pchelinceva. – 6-e izd., pererab. – M.: Norma, 2009. – 720 s.
4. Semejnoe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii i inostrannyh gosudarstv: osnovnye instituty / Pod red. V.V. Zalesskogo. –M.: Izdanie g-na Tihomirova M.Ju., 2004. – 310 s.
5. Smirnovskaja S.I. Ogranichenie roditel'skih prav po semejnomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossijskoj Federacii. Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk: 12.00.03. – Moskva, 2007. – 25 s.
   

NEXT

Start page: Here


Следующие материалы:

 

от Монро до Трампа


Узнать больше?

Ваш email:
email рассылки Конфиденциальность гарантирована
email рассылки

Blischenko 2017


ПОЗДРАВЛЕНИЯ!!!




КРУГЛЫЙ СТОЛ

по проблемам глобальной и региональной безопасности и общественного мнения в рамках международной конференции в Дипломатической академии МИД России

МЕЖДУНАРОДНОЕ ПРАВО

Право международной безопасности



Инсур Фархутдинов: Цикл статей об обеспечении мира и безопасности

№ 4 (104) 2016
Московский журнал международного права
Превентивная самооборона в международном праве: применение и злоупотребление (С.97-25)

№ 2 (105) 2017
Иранская доктрина о превентивной самообороне и международное право (окончание)

№ 1 (104) 2017
Иранская доктрина о превентивной самообороне и международное право

№ 11 (102) 2016
Стратегия Могерини и военная доктрина
Трампа: предстоящие вызовы России


№ 8 (99) 2016
Израильская доктрина o превентивной самообороне и международное право


7 (98) 2016
Международное право о применении государством военной силы против негосударственных участников

№ 2 (93) 2016
Международное право и доктрина США о превентивной самообороне

№ 1 (92) 2016 Международное право о самообороне государств

№ 11 (90) 2015 Международное право о принципе неприменения силы
или угрозы силой:теория и практика


№ 10 (89) 2015 Обеспечение мира и безопасности в Евразии
(Международно правовая оценка событий в Сирии)

Индексирование журнала

Баннер

Актуальная информация

Баннер
Баннер
Баннер

Дорога мира Вьетнама и России

Ирина Анатольевна Умнова (Конюхова) Зав. отделом конституционно-правовых исследований Российского государственного университета правосудия


Вступительное слово
Образ жизни Вьетнама
Лицом к народу
Красота по-вьетнамски
Справедливость и патриотизм Вьетнама
Дорогой мира вместе


ФОТО ОТЧЕТ
Copyright © 2007-2017 «Евразийский юридический журнал». Перепечатывание и публичное использование материалов возможно только с разрешения редакции
Яндекс.Метрика